With the Stanley Cup Final now finished, the NHL is set to formally begin a review into Mike Babcock’s resignation from his role in Columbus in 2023. The process is expected to involve interviews with several individuals connected to the situation, as the league seeks to clarify the circumstances surrounding his exit.
A key question under examination is whether any additional discipline could follow or whether it would clear the way for the Edmonton club to pursue him as a head coaching option.
Edmonton’s coaching search and Babcock’s candidacy
As part of their search for a new head coach, Edmonton prioritized candidates with experience, a proven record of success, and a willingness to take a firm approach with high-profile players. They were previously unable to secure permission to speak with Bruce Cassidy, which narrowed their options.
Babcock was eventually included in their evaluation process. He met with team ownership and senior management and later also took part in an in-person discussion in Toronto with a small group of players. Peter Laviolette, who later accepted a position in Los Angeles, was the other finalist involved in those player meetings.
During the process, Edmonton officials and players reportedly reached out to various league contacts to gather opinions on Babcock before advancing further in discussions.
Feedback, union response and internal concerns
After consulting the league and speaking with player representatives, Edmonton leadership explored whether any formal restriction existed that would prevent them from hiring him. The players’ union reacted negatively and expressed objections during several conversations, although the organization ultimately felt reassured by feedback received from other players and Babcock himself.
Despite external concerns, members of Edmonton’s leadership group were prepared to proceed with the appointment if no league barriers were in place. Those who met with Babcock were also expected internally to share their impressions with teammates to explain the reasoning behind considering him.
At the same time, several agents representing Edmonton players who were not directly involved in the discussions raised reservations, stating they were uncomfortable with the possibility of clients being traded to the club under such circumstances.
Past allegations and investigation challenges
Reports connected to Babcock’s tenure in Columbus included claims extending beyond the previously publicized issue of reviewing players’ phones, with at least one additional interaction causing concern. Although earlier inquiries by the NHL and NHLPA were closed when he stepped down, new scrutiny has emerged around those events.
One complication for the current review is that some former Columbus players and staff members have indicated they are unwilling to revisit what occurred three years ago, creating uncertainty about how fully the investigation can proceed if participation remains limited.
Broader coaching market and pending decisions
Edmonton is currently waiting for the outcome of the league’s review before making a final decision on whether to exclude Babcock from consideration. At the same time, attention is also on Vegas and whether they will allow Bruce Cassidy to be approached by other teams.
With Toronto representing the only other current coaching vacancy, the overall market remains closely tied to these unresolved permissions and ongoing league determinations.